.

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Bypass spam checking for logged-in user (sending email)?
torwill
post Apr 18 2006, 07:00 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 22-August 04
Member No.: 303



Is there a way to bypass spam checking for logged in users?




The reason being is when I am sending spam report to spamcop (with spam mail attached), I always get spam score too high message.



Thanks!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pairote
post Apr 20 2006, 11:50 AM
Post #2


Administrator
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 4,252
Joined: 13-June 03
Member No.: 1



You can completely disable scanning outgoing email. Please follow this instruction.

1. Find these lines:

##
# Reject spam messages with score over 15.
# Keep in mind that $spam_score_int is the messages score multiplied by ten.
##
deny message = Spam score too high ($spam_score)

2. Add the following condition:

# Accept Sender that usually send a lot of emails to minimize spamd load
accept senders = +rv_spam_sender_address_whitelist
accept hosts = @[]
accept hosts = +rv_relay_hosts
accept authenticated = *

# Messages larger than 200k are accepted without spam scanning to reduce spamd load
accept condition = ${if >{$message_size}{200k}{true}}

##
# Reject spam messages with score over 15.
# Keep in mind that $spam_score_int is the messages score multiplied by ten.
##
deny message = Spam score too high ($spam_score)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andr? Marcelo
post May 8 2006, 11:37 PM
Post #3


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: 27-April 06
Member No.: 1,035



Sorry, I didnt understand very well.

This is my rules:

QUOTE
# Messages larger than 150k are accepted without spam scanning to reduce spamd load
accept condition = ${if >{$message_size}{150k}{true}}

##
# Reject spam messages with score over 12.
# Keep in mind that $spam_score_int is the messages score multiplied by ten.
##
deny message = Spam score too high ($spam_score)
# Bypass Sender that usually send a lot of emails to reduce spamd load
!senders = +rv_spam_sender_address_whitelist
spam = mailnull:true/defer_ok
condition = ${if >{$spam_score_int}{120}{1}{0}}


accept


Under and above what line I put the new rules? How would stay my rules?

Thank you!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pairote
post May 8 2006, 11:53 PM
Post #4


Administrator
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 4,252
Joined: 13-June 03
Member No.: 1



Above

accept condition = ${if >{$message_size}{150k}{true}}

Add the rules, the final result will be

# Accept Sender that usually send a lot of emails to minimize spamd load
accept senders = +rv_spam_sender_address_whitelist
accept hosts = @[]
accept hosts = +rv_relay_hosts
accept authenticated = *
accept condition = ${if >{$message_size}{150k}{true}}
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andr? Marcelo
post May 9 2006, 12:12 AM
Post #5


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: 27-April 06
Member No.: 1,035



Thanks a lot pairote for your fast replay. Yor antivirus/antispam solution is very good, congratulations!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tiagop
post Sep 16 2006, 07:34 PM
Post #6


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 9-May 06
Member No.: 1,073



# Messages larger than 150k are accepted without spam scanning to reduce spamd load
accept condition = ${if >{$message_size}{150k}{true}}

##
# Reject spam messages with score over 15.
# Keep in mind that $spam_score_int is the messages score multiplied by ten.
##
deny message = Spam score too high ($spam_score)

# Accept Sender that usually send a lot of emails to minimize spamd load
accept senders = +rv_spam_sender_address_whitelist
accept hosts = @[]
accept hosts = +rv_relay_hosts
accept authenticated = *

# Bypass Sender that usually send a lot of emails to reduce spamd load
!senders = +rv_spam_sender_address_whitelist
spam = mailnull:true/defer_ok
condition = ${if >{$spam_score_int}{150}{1}{0}}

##

Like this?

Thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd September 2010 - 10:37 PM